Ads For Period Underwear Go Too Far

I know we’re expected to just jump up and accept everything related to sexuality these days but… I have a mind of my own. Not a popular thing, kind of a collector’s item these days.

I agree with these ads being censored. At the very least they could be edited with consideration for the children, elderly and others who all ride subways and travel about in cities and towns (places with sidewalks in general).

Men may object to any mention of periods and menstruation (or breasts as anything other than sex objects). But, they aren’t the only people who don’t want to see ads for period underwear.

I don’t want to see most of these ads while standing on a subway platform surrounded by the general public. The state of my underwear and whether or not I’m OTR (on the rag, as my brother calls it) is my business only. Private. Hence, the whole private parts thing.

I also don’t want children to see sexual images like the blush pink orange sections or the weird dripping egg. Children may not connect the dots on these images but I am and I’m not liking having them around. Or that woman leaning back in her chair, wearing just underwear. Who does that on any kind of normal day? Is she having cramps, falling asleep or trying to orgasm while seated? Then there’s the piano bench woman… is she supposed to be suicidal from blood loss? In short, this is not for public consumption.

Why not keep it plain and simple? The image of the woman in the sweater and the text without the extra comments/ editorial. Why isn’t that enough? Is the purpose of the ad to sell underwear to women, sell porn to men, sell sex while on your period or just upset the general population including women who can’t have children, have lost children, have started menopause, etc. It’s not just children I’m thinking of.

I don’t have a problem with the ads appearing. They sell condoms in plain view. Porn can be bought at most newstands. I miss the old days when people still kept a few secrets about their privates. I wish they would!

We’re annoyed they even considered censoring this in the first place.

Source: The NYC Subway Actually Considered Banning Ads For Period Underwear | Her Campus

I’m Afraid I’m… Sexually Impure

I’ve dated, I’ve been engaged and I have been married too. So, I can not call myself pure and I doubt many people would believe me if I did. So I’m impure, not quite angelic and maybe just a bit devilish even.

Why do we never (that I have seen) think of men as pure or impure? Is it all about the sex? I don’t think so. There is more to it.

Men never have menstruation or develop a person inside their body and then push that out of their bodies with all the biological debris which ensues. Men think that is gross. Odd that it’s been working that way since the dawn of the first mammal at least. Before that there were more egg layers and less female death likely too.

Anyway, is all that what makes women pure or impure?

Does that mean chickens are more pure than human women? There’s a question of values for you.

I never had children, just sex. I think my real impurity comes from my fantasies, imagination and the fact that I let myself have imaginative fantasies. I’m not heavily into religions which talk about hell, evil or demons. (I’m my own style of Pagan). So pure or impure is not so relevant in a religious or holy way.

We could talk about being fresh but that gets into a whole retail thing with sprays and other concoctions I don’t use. So… does that mean I’m not fresh. Impure and not fresh. Doomed I guess.